Democrats dissatisfied by DOJ’s pause on ‘anti-weaponization fund’
The U.S. Department of Justice is temporarily backing down from its plan to launch a $1.77 billion “anti-weaponization fund” after a federal judge issued a short-term restraining order.
Congressional Democrats, however, vowed Monday to bring forward legislation permanently banning the fund, forcing Republicans to vote on an issue so politically toxic it derailed the advance of their $72 billion budget reconciliation bill in May.
“If [President Donald] Trump and Republicans are truly abandoning this corrupt scheme, they should have zero problem banning it in law,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., posted Monday afternoon on social media. “This week, Senate Democrats will push legislation to ban this slush fund and ensure no president can ever do this again. Trump’s word is nowhere near enough.”
In its statement Monday, the DOJ said it disagreed “strongly” with Virginia-based Judge Leonie Brinkema’s decision to block the creation of the fund until June 12.
The money – sourced from Trump’s settlement with the IRS after he sued the agency for the leakage of his 2019 and 2020 tax returns – would support people claiming that the former Biden administration unfairly targeted them for political or ideological reasons.
Rather than promising to drop the fund altogether, the DOJ simply stated it “will abide by the Court’s ruling,” which expires in less than two weeks.
“You don’t get credit for complying with a temporary court order,” Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., said in response to the DOJ’s announcement. “Trump’s scheme to rob American taxpayers won’t be dead until Congress bans it.”
Although Republicans’ political troubles will continue, the DOJ’s decision may sway enough Republican holdouts in the Senate to support the $72 billion bill funding immigration enforcement agencies.
The party-line bill, which funds ICE and U.S. Border Patrol for the next three years, needs only a majority vote to pass the Republican-controlled Senate.
It was set to do so until the DOJ unveiled the “anti-weaponization fund,” causing Republican senators to deadlock over whether they should attach restrictions on the controversial fund to the reconciliation bill.
Several Republican holdouts have expressed optimism over the DOJ’s Monday announcement, though none have publicly commented on how they will vote. Republican leadership is hoping to get the bill to Trump’s desk by Friday.
Latest News Stories
Legal experts: Supreme Court should decide energy policy framework over climate lawsuits
Frankfort Village Board Approves Four-Year Contract with Public Works and Utilities Union
Judge orders tariff refunds, but Friday’s hearing could set course
Iran War Powers resolution fails in House
Chicago police monitor Iran-U.S. conflict; public advised to be aware
Illinois secretary of state wants nearly 2% budget increase
Illinois Quick Hits: Suspect arrested in connection with East St. Louis killing
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Landfill Committee for February 10, 2026
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board for February 19, 2026
Board Approves Joliet Township Clean Fill Facility Despite Environmental Objections
Will County Board Unanimously Rejects Controversial Solar Farm in Troy Township
Oil cos. ask to pause Chicago climate ‘deception’ suit til SCOTUS weighs in