Congress skips town without passing $72B immigration enforcement bill
In an epic breakdown of negotiations, Congress is leaving town without voting on Republicans’ roughly $72 billion budget reconciliation bill.
Senate Republicans ultimately deadlocked Thursday over whether to include restrictions on the Department of Justice’s controversial new “anti-weaponization fund” within the party-line bill, which funds federal immigration enforcement agencies for the next three years.
Because both chambers return the first week of June, Republicans will almost certainly miss President Donald Trump’s deadline of June 1 when he wants the legislation on his desk.
The Senate had already delayed a vote on the bill due to its $1 billion earmark for Secret Security to use on White House ballroom security upgrades. Trump had previously said the venue, currently under construction, would be funded only by donor dollars.
Republican leaders eventually decided Wednesday to throw out the provision – much to Trump’s chagrin – due to procedural complications and lack of member support.
Yet some Senate Republicans are still withholding their support unless the bill reins in the unrelated roughly $1.8 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund the DOJ recently announced.
The fund – a politically toxic issue for Republicans – would support individuals making legal claims that the former Biden administration unfairly targeted them for political or ideological reasons.
“Senate Democrats held strong. Senate Republicans are in chaos,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., posted on X. “This is just the beginning – we will keep fighting this bill, filled with Trump vanity projects and billions for his rogue police forces, for as long as it takes.”
Republicans’ unconventional tactic of providing advance annual appropriations via the filibuster-proof budget reconciliation process is a response to Democrats shutting down the Department of Homeland Security for 76 days.
Senate Democrats had refused to support any appropriations bill funding ICE and U.S. Border Patrol for the current fiscal year unless it instituted a laundry list of agency reforms, causing Republicans to eventually walk away.
“If this were about making reforms to how ICE and Border Patrol does business, then Democrats would have accepted the robust package of legislative reforms they were offered by the White House or engaged in serious negotiations to tweak the package – but they didn’t,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said Thursday.
Responding to Schumer’s accusations that funding immigration enforcement without including affordability-focused provisions is “totally out of touch with what Americans need,” Thune said the comments “obfuscate what is happening here.”
Republicans have been laser-focused on making life easier for hardworking Americans. But remarkably, it is possible to walk and chew gum at the same time,” Thune said. “And we can protect Americans by protecting our borders and continue to pass legislation that will alleviate some of the pressures facing hardworking Americans.”
Latest News Stories
Trump slices China fentanyl tariff in half following meeting with Xi
Trump orders Department of War to begin testing nuclear weapons
WATCH: Tax proposals draw questions from Pritzker and GOP state rep
Illinois quick hits: Former sheriff’s deputy guilty in Massey murder; appeals court intervenes in Bavino case
WATCH: Warnings of higher IL property taxes heard as pension bill advances
Top-selling automaker confirms U.S. investment, but no details yet
Fentanyl poised to take center stage during Trump, Xi meeting
‘Outrageous’: Lawmakers bash Biden admin for targeting, surveilling 156 Republicans
WATCH: Cruz calls on House to impeach federal judge over subpoenas of Republicans
WATCH: Pritzker declares agricultural trade ‘crisis’ while Trump touts new deals
Amnesty International condemns U.S. strikes on suspected drug boats
‘Astonishingly reckless:’ IL Dems intro tax on ‘unrealized gains’ to fund transit
Illinois beef producers say Trump’s Argentina beef plan hurts farmers
WATCH: Expect tax and fee increases for veto; Democrats want more sanctuary policies