New Jersey sued over ICE mask ban
The Trump administration is taking New Jersey Gov. Mikkie Sherrill to federal court over newly signed legislation banning ICE agents from wearing masks during immigration operations in the state.
The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Newark, alleges that the so-called Law Enforcement Officer Protection Act violates federal law by giving state officials control over federal immigration enforcement activities. The DOJ asks a federal judge to block the law, saying it threatens the safety of federal officers who have faced a wave of harassment, doxing, and even violence.
“To be clear, the Federal Government will not comply with this blatantly unconstitutional law,” the DOJ wrote in the 24-page complaint. “But the threat of enforcement by Defendants chills individual officers from protecting themselves and performing their duties. The consequences for public safety are severe.”
Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate called New Jersey’s law an “illegal attempt to regulate the federal government” and said threatening officers with prosecution “for simply protecting their identities and their families also chills the enforcement of federal law and compromises sensitive law enforcement operations.”
“The Department of Justice will steadfastly protect the privacy and safety of law enforcement from unconstitutional state laws like New Jersey’s,” Shumate said in a statement.
New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport vowed to defend the new law in court, saying it “protects both law enforcement and the public by limiting the use of masking while including careful exceptions to protect law enforcement safety and operational needs.”
The Democrat said allowing ICE agents to wear masks during operations in the state will “undermine public trust and accountability, and make it easier for criminals to impersonate our officers.”
“To this day, the Federal Government still cannot explain when its officials need to mask or forgo identification in violation of this law, or why they actually need to do so, particularly given the serious safety concerns inherent in anonymized policing,” she said in a statement. “New Jersey responded thoughtfully and carefully to these profound public safety concerns, and we look forward to responding in court.”
Last year, the DOJ filed a similar lawsuit against California after Democrats in the state passed a mask ban. A federal judge blocked the state from enforcing the law.
New Jersey Democrats and immigrant rights groups say the new restrictions are necessary amid an uptick in ICE operations in the state targeting people for deportation.
“When federal immigration officers violate the law and sow fear in our communities, they undermine public trust in law enforcement and make it harder for us to keep the public safe,” Sherrill said in a statement at the time.
The Justice Department sued New Jersey in February over an executive order signed by Sherrill that barred ICE agents from using state-owned property as staging areas for operations, accusing her administration of “harboring criminal offenders” from law enforcement.
The governor was also criticized by the Trump administration for launching a new public website urging the public to report ICE activity, upload videos of enforcement actions, and “Know Your Rights” information for people who are detained.
Latest News Stories
Last four government spending bills pass U.S. House
Illinois Quick Hits: HHS: IL abortion referral rule violates federal law
Vance blasts media, defends ICE during Minneapolis visit
Trump says Greenland deal underway despite few details
WATCH: Showdown at SCOW: Court takes up voter-approved natural gas protection
Bill would ban gender transition procedures for minors
WATCH: Resolution condemning federal immigration law enforcement sparks debate
WATCH: Lawmakers spar over taxpayer-funded Trump investigation
Chicago splits pension payments in hopes of Improving cash flow
Adequate preparation missing for GenAI in higher ed
Following GOP criticism, Pritzker finds $481.6 million in budget reserves
Critics slam Illinois’ $36M park grants as political, wasteful