Illinois millionaire’s tax moves closer to November ballot
(The Center Square) – A measure giving Illinois voters the opportunity to consider a millionaire’s tax is one step closer to the November ballot.
House Joint Resolution Constitutional Amendment 21 would raise the tax rate on income more than $1 million from 4.95% to 7.95%.
State Rep. La Shawn Ford, D-Chicago, argued in favor of his resolution before the House Revenue and Finance Committee late Tuesday afternoon.
“This will make Illinois schools better. It will make Illinois stronger by making sure that we can invest in our schools and provide property tax relief to families,” Ford said.
Half the revenue collected from the millionaire’s tax would be used for property tax relief. The other half would go to public school districts on a per-pupil basis.
Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability data based on 2023 tax returns suggested that the millionaire’s tax would have generated $2.2 billion in revenue.
Taxpayers’ Federation of Illinois President Maurice Scholten said his organization does not oppose a graduated income tax, but it does oppose having a dollar amount in the state constitution.
“So it’ll be $1 million this year, next year, every year, and in 2045, 2065, more and more taxpayers will be hit by that. If the General Assembly feels that the right amount is $1 million, that should be indexed to inflation somehow,” Scholten said.
Scholten also said small business owners who sell could be hit by a “one-time income event.”
State Rep. Amy Elik, R-Alton, asked Ford how the tax would apply to couples.
“So you’re saying joint filers $1 million plus, so in that situation maybe they would file married filing separately to avoid the 3%?” Elik said.
“To maintain under the threshold, yes,” Ford said.
When state Rep. Kyle Moore, R-Quincy, asked why the resolution language did not specify how revenue from the tax would be distributed, Ford admitted there were no plans for allocation but the General Assembly would have that responsibility after voters approve the amendment.
“We don’t give our taxpayers, we don’t give the people of Illinois the credit that they deserve by thinking that they’re just dumb enough to think that this money’s going to be used for the proper purpose. It’s not, you know that,” state Rep. Steven Reick, R-Woodstock, said.
Ford suggested that he could work with Reick to put a lockbox in place to make sure the funds would be used appropriately.
The amendment passed out of committee with a partisan vote of 13-7 and now heads to the House floor.
If three fifths of the General Assembly approves HJRCA 21 by May 3, voters will decide the amendment’s fate Nov. 3.
Latest News Stories
Student suspended for pro-ICE flyer while NEA spends $1.7M to help anti-ICE protests
Evers vetoes bills to exempt overtime, cash tips from income tax
Illinois housing affordability efforts pit tax cuts against new spending
Report: AAMC’s claims that patients are better treated by doctor of same race debunked
Coloradans react to ruling against ban on conversion therapy
Illinois Quick Hits: Chicago city workers owe more than $19M
JJC Board Prepares for 2028 Bond Expiration, Advances Grundy Campus Despite Objections
Attorney expects conversion therapy ruling to impact Illinois ban
White House govt funding request for 2027 cuts $73 billion
Dems sue over Trump’s executive order on mail-in ballots
GAO again warns Congress about nation’s ‘unsustainable fiscal path’
Millionaire’s tax proposal draws mixed reviews as deadline approaches