Illinois millionaire’s tax moves closer to November ballot
(The Center Square) – A measure giving Illinois voters the opportunity to consider a millionaire’s tax is one step closer to the November ballot.
House Joint Resolution Constitutional Amendment 21 would raise the tax rate on income more than $1 million from 4.95% to 7.95%.
State Rep. La Shawn Ford, D-Chicago, argued in favor of his resolution before the House Revenue and Finance Committee late Tuesday afternoon.
“This will make Illinois schools better. It will make Illinois stronger by making sure that we can invest in our schools and provide property tax relief to families,” Ford said.
Half the revenue collected from the millionaire’s tax would be used for property tax relief. The other half would go to public school districts on a per-pupil basis.
Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability data based on 2023 tax returns suggested that the millionaire’s tax would have generated $2.2 billion in revenue.
Taxpayers’ Federation of Illinois President Maurice Scholten said his organization does not oppose a graduated income tax, but it does oppose having a dollar amount in the state constitution.
“So it’ll be $1 million this year, next year, every year, and in 2045, 2065, more and more taxpayers will be hit by that. If the General Assembly feels that the right amount is $1 million, that should be indexed to inflation somehow,” Scholten said.
Scholten also said small business owners who sell could be hit by a “one-time income event.”
State Rep. Amy Elik, R-Alton, asked Ford how the tax would apply to couples.
“So you’re saying joint filers $1 million plus, so in that situation maybe they would file married filing separately to avoid the 3%?” Elik said.
“To maintain under the threshold, yes,” Ford said.
When state Rep. Kyle Moore, R-Quincy, asked why the resolution language did not specify how revenue from the tax would be distributed, Ford admitted there were no plans for allocation but the General Assembly would have that responsibility after voters approve the amendment.
“We don’t give our taxpayers, we don’t give the people of Illinois the credit that they deserve by thinking that they’re just dumb enough to think that this money’s going to be used for the proper purpose. It’s not, you know that,” state Rep. Steven Reick, R-Woodstock, said.
Ford suggested that he could work with Reick to put a lockbox in place to make sure the funds would be used appropriately.
The amendment passed out of committee with a partisan vote of 13-7 and now heads to the House floor.
If three fifths of the General Assembly approves HJRCA 21 by May 3, voters will decide the amendment’s fate Nov. 3.
Latest News Stories
U.S. adds 172k jobs in ‘strong’ May report, unemployment remains at 4.3%
Researchers put a number on how much debt U.S. can carry
Colorado governor vetoes legislation allowing ICE to be sued
Ballots processed slowly as Californians await 36-day count
WATCH: WA mayor stands by pro-ICE, anti-Antifa proclamations
U.S. House narrowly passes bill to fund USDA, FDA in 2027
Military advocates concerned about active-duty voters
Ruling: Illinois Supreme Court likely overstepped in ousting of Cook County judge
Illinois passes law to restrict new federal migrant detention centers
Alcohol tax amendments may be unconstitutional
Illinois quick hits: Lawsuit filed over drunk driving deal involving noncitizen
Michigan township denies solar expansion after months of controversy