College funding bill draws dissent from big Illinois universities
(The Center Square) – Lawmakers questioned Illinois university leaders about a contentious bill that adjusts how new money is allocated to in-state, public universities.
The new funding formula would favor smaller schools with the least funding.
HB 1581, the “Adequate and Equitable Public University Funding Act,” proposes a yearly increase over 15 years of $135 million to state university funding, each public university getting a specific percentage, with priority given to universities that are the most in need.
University of Illinois system President Tim Killeen, whose schools are by-far the highest publicly funded in the state, expressed strong opposition to the bill and where current percentages would put their coming funding increases.
“There is no number that doesn’t, in a way, negatively affect the University of Illinois system,” Killeen said.
Nicholas Jones, executive vice president of the system, added that they would receive smaller increases to yearly funding than they have previously, which could force them to increase tuition costs and out-of-state admissions for new revenue.
“With the current allocation, University of Illinois receives about 51% of the total increase in appropriation. If the formula went into effect fully funded at $135 million, University of Illinois would get 28% of the appropriation,” Jones said.
Committee chair Sen. Michael Halpin, D-Galesburg, was highly critical of the university’s position.
“I think it’s informative to see what the University of Illinois thinks it needs this year and compare that to what the rest of our universities are asking for. Twenty percent of $135 million is about $28 million. That is almost half of Western Illinois’ annual operations budget,” said Halpin.
In a House committee hearing last week, bill sponsor Rep. Carol Ammons, D-Champaign, spoke about the funding formula bill, saying it is considering student needs, and that it would most benefit those students.
The bill passed the committee on the agreement Ammons would return to the house committee after negotiations and adjustments take place.
Among other state schools, support for the bill is unambiguous. The U of I system receives about 51% of new funds under the current system, so the new need-based system could mean a large shift in how and where a significant amount of state tax dollars are used.
In the Senate hearing, Western Illinois University President Dr. Kristi Mindrup spoke in favor of the bill, saying it would provide needed funding for all state schools, calling the current system arbitrary.
“WIU stands united with seven other public universities throughout the state in support of the legislation because additional funding strengthens education quality and affordability and strengthens local economies,” said Mindrup.
Northern Illinois University President Dr. Lisa Freeman also reflected her support, saying it would be a long-term solution to a major problem.
“Working together, we have an opportunity to increase attainment, uplift communities and strengthen the Illinois economy,” Freeman said. “That’s why NIU strongly supports adoption of the proposed higher education funding formula that addresses long-standing inequities in Illinois higher education funding system.”
Latest News Stories
Report: $12B spent on assisted living Medicare, Medicaid
Illinois Quick Hits: Aqua seeks water rate hike
Pritzker signs AI regulation critics say harms innovation, ‘picks winners’
Microsoft cuts over 600 Washington jobs, 4,800 globally amid corporate restructuring
Report: Modernization of central bank intertwined with regulations, security
500-plus fugitives arrested across two states
WalletHub study examines the financial independence of US states
Michigan’s Democrat primary in U.S. Senate race narrows
DOJ, states could secure 53 million eggs in price manipulation settlement
WATCH: State fails to investigate daycares with no children despite media reports
Illinois Quick Hits: Woman sentenced for voting twice
Embattled state lawmaker resigns after investigation into ‘unethical’ behavior
Everyday Economics: What jobs data actually show and why Fed is changing how it talks