Graham blocks govt. funding vote over policy demands as deadline looms
With only hours before the federal government runs out of money, tensions are rising in the U.S. Senate as a handful of Republicans block a vote on federal funding bills over policy demands.
Supported by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., has placed a hold on the vote to advance the remaining funding legislation for fiscal year 2026.
As of Friday afternoon, Graham refused to lift the hold unless he was guaranteed a vote in the near future on legislation prohibiting sanctuary cities.
He also demanded a vote on an amendment to the Homeland Security bill that would prohibit the federal government in most circumstances from collecting Americans’ metadata without their knowledge, as well as allow both senators and private individuals to sue the federal government if it does so.
“I’m asking for two simple things: give me a chance to express myself on what the solution to our problems of immigration are – I’m not asking for an outcome, [just] for a vote,” Graham told lawmakers Friday. “And as to Arctic Frost, I want to have a chance to have a vote on a version that would expand private cause of actions for non-members of Congress who may have a claim against Jack Smith.”
Some of Graham’s colleagues have rebuked his actions, with Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., urging him not to shut down the government “to make a point.”
“The reason why we’re not moving forward today doesn’t have anything to do with the Democrats. It has to do with a handful of Republicans who are refusing to let us move forward,” Tillis said. “We’re going to shut down the government because some Republicans refuse to take the win, refuse to take a negotiated agreement that the president agrees with.”
Senate leaders from both parties struck a funding deal Thursday – which President Donald Trump supported – and had planned to vote that evening.
Under the agreement, the Senate split off the Homeland Security funding bill from the six-bill appropriations package and planned to pass the remaining five, sending them to Trump’s desk.
Lawmakers would then redraft the Homeland Security bill to include Democrats’ demands — bans on mask-wearing and roving patrols, body-worn camera requirements, and warrant rule changes, among other things.
But since restructuring and passing that bill could take weeks, senators will also pass a short-term Continuing Resolution to keep Homeland Security funding on cruise control in the meantime.
The House must approve the CR, however, and it will not return until after Jan. 30, meaning funding for some agencies covered under the Homeland Security bill will lapse.
While a weekend-long partial shutdown would have little negative impact, many Republican congressmen have expressed opposition to severing the House-passed Homeland Security bill and tailoring it to Democrats’ wishes.
“[Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer’s current demands, compounded by a lack of Conservative priorities, are an absolute non-starter,” Rep. Mark Harris, R-N.C., said.
Latest News Stories
Homeland Secretary: Pritzker, Johnson are protecting dangerous criminals
Reports: DOJ probing NY AG’s fraud case against Trump
Trump warns of ‘Great Depression’ if appeals court curbs tariff power
Illinois in focus: DHS announces new facility; NFIB urges veto of regulations; minority scholarship lawsuit moves forward
Abbott to call ‘special session after special session’ in response to AWOL Dems
WATCH: Illinois In Focus Daily | Friday Aug. 8th, 2025
Legislator urges leaders to focus on relief for Illinois’ high property taxes
Texas House, Illinois state senator sue 33 AWOL Democrats in Illinois court
WATCH: Democrat state redistricting efforts created unfair advantages, lawmaker says
Illinois quick hits: Fatal helicopter crash; Comptroller orders another extra pension payment
New poll: 50.2% of Illinois voters view Pritzker unfavorably
WATCH: Pritzker welcomes FBI looking for TX Dems in IL, dismisses bribery question