Michigan law firm sued over alleged racial bias in diversity scholarships

Michigan law firm sued over alleged racial bias in diversity scholarships

Spread the love

Two groups have sued a Michigan law firm for operating scholarships they allege are “racially discriminatory.”

Do No Harm, a national anti-DEI policy advocacy group, and the American Alliance for Equal Rights, filed the suit last week on behalf of three students against the law firm, Buckfire & Buckfire, P.C.

The lawsuit alleges that the firm’s Medical Diversity Scholarship and Law School Diversity Scholarship violate the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed basic civil rights regardless of race. That applies to racial discrimination in contracts, which includes scholarships.

The Center Square spoke exclusively with representatives from both parties involved in the lawsuit.

“Merit, not race, should serve as the legitimate basis for awarding scholarships,” Dr. Kurt Miceli, medical director at Do No Harm told The Center Square. “Yet, discredited frameworks such as critical race theory and racial concordance have infiltrated medical and legal institutions, propagating divisive identity politics.”

Lawrence J. Buckfire, president of Buckfire Law Firm and its lead trial attorney, called the lawsuit “completely frivolous legally and factually.” He dismissed the plaintiffs and their motivations for filing the lawsuit.

“It was filed by two nasty, divisive organizations that intentionally target businesses and institutions that promote diversity,” Buckfire told The Center Square. “The three members who complain they didn’t win scholarships were not good candidates and it’s just sour grapes they lost. The plaintiffs targeted the wrong law firm in the wrong venue to pursue such a hoax of a case.”

Both scholarships in question require applicants to be “a member of an ethnic, racial, or other minority” or “demonstrate a defined commitment to issues of diversity within their community.”

Operated by the firm since 2014, the scholarships award a $2,000 scholarship to one recipient each year. Buckfire said the scholarships are not racially biased.

“All people, regardless of race and ethnicity, were eligible to apply for the scholarships,” he said. “It is clearly laid out on the scholarship submission forms. The fact that the losers were not awarded scholarships had nothing to do with their race, and they knew they were eligible to apply for the scholarships because they submitted applications and essays.”

While white candidates were eligible for the scholarships, the lawsuit alleges they were discriminated against by not being selected for the scholarships.

“In its history, Buckfire has awarded scholarships to 25 students,” it alleges. “Zero were white.”

Miceli is certain the court will decide in favor of the plaintiffs.

“We are confident the court will determine that Buckfire has indeed violated the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and will order them to cease discriminating based on race,” he said. “The objective then is not to end Buckfire’s scholarships, but rather see to it that they are awarded on lawful and legitimate grounds—like merit—rather than race-based considerations.”

On the other hand, Buckfire anticipates the case will soon be dismissed. He alleged the students represented in the case are “three white guys whining about not winning a $2,000 diversity scholarship” and stood by the scholarships.

“As the son of a child Holocaust survivor, it was instilled upon me at an early age that our country should embrace people of all races and religions, and promoting diversity is very important to our firm,” he said. “Our scholarships have helped many people over the years achieve their educational goals.”

Edward Blum, president of the American Alliance for Equal Rights, argued the scholarships are illegal.

“The fact that a law firm is flagrantly discriminating against certain individuals because of their race is flabbergasting,” Blum said in a press release. “There are many deserving students from all races and ethnicities who need help affording law and medical school. Excluding some of them because of their race is unfair and unlawful.”

The lawsuit is currently filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

frankfort-square-park-district.2

Developer to Donate Land, Playground for New Park in Tinley Park

A new park is coming to a Tinley Park development thanks to a land and equipment donation from a local home builder. Frank Bradley, owner of Crana Homes, is donating...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Briefs: Frankfort Square Park District for June 12, 2025

The Frankfort Square Park District Board of Commissioners formally adopted its annual Budget and Appropriation Ordinance on June 12, a key legal step that sets the district’s spending authority for...
frankfort-school-district-161.2-e1754272831494

Summit Hill Board Approves School Resource Officer for Two Schools in Contentious Vote

The Summit Hill School District 161 Board of Education voted to hire a School Resource Officer (SRO) to serve two of its schools, approving an annual expenditure of up to...
frankfort-school-district-161.1

Summit Hill School Board Reverses Controversial Principal Non-Renewal Decision

In a significant reversal, the Summit Hill School District 161 Board of Education voted to repeal previous resolutions that aimed to not renew the contract of an unnamed principal, effectively...
frankfort-school-district-161.2-e1754272831494

Meeting Briefs: Summit Hill School District 161 for June 11, 2025

The Summit Hill School District 161 Board of Education made several major decisions at its June 11 meeting, including the hiring of a School Resource Officer for two schools after...
Will-County-Ad-Hoc-Ordinance-Review-Committee-Meeting-June-10-2025

Will County to Draft New Harassment Policy Amid Debate Over Board Authority

The Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee will draft a new, county-wide general harassment policy after a lengthy debate on Tuesday revealed the complexities of the county’s legal obligations and...
Will-County-Ad-Hoc-Ordinance-Review-Committee-Meeting-June-10-2025

Committee Uncovers Gaps in County Asset Tracking, Calls for Better System

A review of Will County’s fiscal policies on Tuesday highlighted significant gaps in how the county tracks its physical assets, from office furniture to squad cars, prompting calls from the...
frankfort-park-district

Frankfort Park District in Dispute with Five Oaks HOA Over Park Development Rules

The Frankfort Park District is taking legal steps to untangle itself from the development rules of the Five Oaks homeowners association, asserting that as a public body, it "cannot be...
Meeting-Briefs

In Brief: Ordinance Review Committee Actions

The Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee met June 10 to continue its comprehensive update of the county code. Here are some of the key actions and discussions: Court Fees...
frankfort-park-district.1

Frankfort Park District Kicks Off Busy Summer Season with Races and New Events

The Frankfort Park District is in full summer swing, with a packed schedule of programs and events that includes an expanded day camp, new community parties, and the 25th anniversary...
frankfort-park-district

Meeting Briefs: Frankfort Park District Board for June 10, 2025

The Frankfort Park District Board of Commissioners discussed a legal dispute with the Five Oaks homeowners association over park development rules at its Tuesday meeting. Executive Director Gina Hassett reported...
Will-County-Jail-e1750123778582

Will County Jail Faces Major Staffing Crisis as 70 Employees Eligible to Retire by 2030

County officials warn of potential budget impact as adult detention facility grapples with unprecedented turnover Will County's adult detention facility is heading toward a staffing crisis that could significantly impact...
will-county-board.3

Will County Health Department Reports Sharp Decline in Overdose Deaths

2025 fatalities running 40% lower than previous year, officials attribute success to expanded Narcan distribution Will County is experiencing a significant reduction in overdose deaths, with 2025 fatalities running 40%...
will-county-board

Solar Project Extensions Approved as Industry Faces Permitting Delays

Three solar energy projects received 180-day extensions from Will County's Land Use & Development Committee Thursday as developers continue working through lengthy permitting processes with utility companies and other agencies....
will-county-board.3

Committee Approves Truck Terminal Despite Residential Concerns

A Monee Township truck terminal received approval from Will County's Land Use & Development Committee Thursday despite concerns about its proximity to residential areas. The committee voted 5-1 to approve...