Trump’s tariffs on imported drugs could raise prices
Analysts are warning that U.S. consumers could face higher prices after President Donald Trump promised it will hit imported drugs with a 100% tariff next week, but exemptions and generic drugs could reduce frustration at the pharmacy counter.
Trump wants to use tariffs to push drug makers to boost U.S. production and strengthen U.S. supply chains. Trump also said tariffs could help lower drug costs.
The president said a 100% tariff on imported patented drugs will start Oct. 1, with exceptions for companies building manufacturing plants in the U.S.
“There will, therefore, be no Tariff on these Pharmaceutical Products if construction has started,” Trump wrote late Thursday.
Trump didn’t mention generic drugs, which account for about 90% of prescriptions, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The 62-word announcement contained few details, as have the president’s other tariff announcements.
John Crowley, president and CEO of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, said the advocacy organization supports Trump’s vision for bringing more drug manufacturing to the U.S., but said the immediate tariffs could hurt smaller companies. Many large drug makers already have U.S. operations or working to build them.
“The immediacy of punitive, 100% tariffs on innovative medicines for any company without ‘shovels in the ground’ would devastate our nation’s small and mid-sized biotechnology companies,” he said in a statement. “These 3,000+ companies are the heart and soul of America’s vitally important biotechnology industry.”
Crowley said smaller companies don’t have access to cash for immediate U.S. building capacity, but could do so over time.
“Due to the complexity and capital-intensive nature of biomanufacturing, the vast majority of these small-to mid-size biotech innovators rely on contract manufacturers to produce their medicines,” he said. “These companies especially need time and stability in both the policy environment and capital markets to explore domestic manufacture of their often life-saving medicines, many of which are for rare and fatal diseases, often in children.”
Crowley also warned that the immediate tariffs could help China.
“Immediate tariffs in the biotechnology industry threaten America’s health, national security, economic stability, and place as the world’s leader in biotechnology,” he said. “They would also devastate our industry and accelerate China’s path to biotech dominance – which we cannot see happen.”
Alex Schriver, senior vice president of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, said money spent on tariffs cannot be spent on cures.
“Most innovative medicines prescribed in America are already made in America. PhRMA companies continue to announce hundreds of billions in new U.S. investments thanks to President Trump’s pro-growth tax and regulatory policies,” he said in a statement. “Tariffs risk those plans because every dollar spent on tariffs is a dollar that cannot be invested in American manufacturing or the development of future treatments and cures.”
Schriver said it could raise costs for consumers.
“Medicines have historically been exempt from tariffs because they raise costs and could lead to shortages,” he said.
Latest News Stories
Illinois takes over health insurance marketplace in 2026 amid skepticism
WATCH: IL state reps challenge IEMA-OHS responses to local agencies
Judge expands restraining order against ‘Beto’ O’Rourke, adds ActBlue
Executive Committee Members Decry Roadside Litter, Call for Action Against Garbage Haulers
Reversing Biden’s precedent, students complete FAFSA in minutes at beta-testing event
Trump, Zelenskyy to meet Monday in steps toward peace with Russia
Possible ‘agreement’ reached in Trump-Putin meeting; more discussion likely
WATCH: Gun rights supporters celebrate 9th Circuit’s ruling against CA gun rationing law
Feds sue California over emission standards for trucks
Illinois quick hits: ‘Lawsuit inferno’ bill takes effect after Pritzker signed 267 measures Friday
WATCH: UW-authored study on surgery times contradicts CMS basis for reimbursement cuts
State defends gun ban district court ruled unconstitutional