Think tank, election attorney support Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting
While most Democrats are opposed, President Donald Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting, which he says is ripe for fraud, has been met with approval from both an election attorney as well as the America First Policy Institute.
“President Trump should be applauded for leading the charge to ensure that every American’s vote matters and is not undermined by corruption,” the America First Policy Institute (AFPI) told The Center Square by email.
“This is not just a policy fight,” AFPI said. “This is a fight for the survival of our republic.”
AFPI is a non-profit and non-partisan research institute aiming to “advance policies that put the American people first,” according to its website.
Election attorney and founder of law firm OGC Law, LLC Greg Teufel told The Center Square that “eliminating mail-in balloting would go a long way toward restoring confidence in our election procedures.”
“Mail-in voting has long been recognized as the most vulnerable type of voting for election fraud,” Teufel said.
“Because ballots are not completed in front of election officials, coercion, bribery, and voting on behalf of people of limited competence is all possible,” Teufel told The Center Square.
AFPI likewise told The Center Square that “President Trump is right in saying that our elections will never be secure so long as we have widespread use of mail-in ballots.”
“With rare exception, mass mail-in voting is a recipe for fraud and chaos,” AFPI said. “Other nations recognize this, and many abandoned this broken system decades ago.”
“The United States of America is the greatest nation in the world, and our electoral system should set the global standard for security and transparency,” AFPI said.
AFPI listed to The Center Square examples of the issues of mail-in voting.
For instance, “in some states, one now can apply to be on the voter rolls as a ‘permanent absentee voter,’ which means one automatically gets an absentee ballot application every election,” AFPI said.
Additionally, “reliance solely on mail-in voting may lead to the disenfranchisement of America’s eligible citizen class and could also lead to fraud through ballot trafficking,” AFPI told The Center Square.
“Mass mail-in voting presents vulnerabilities with the chain of custody of a ballot and increases the prevalence of error in states that do not maintain clean voter rolls,” AFPI said.
The Center for Election Innovation and Research did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
Trump posted on his Truth Social account Monday: “I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS.”
“ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS,” Trump said.
The president further said that “while we’re at it,” he will get rid of “Highly ‘Inaccurate,’ Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election.”
Trump said the efforts to protect elections will be brought about by an executive order “to help bring honesty to the 2026 Midterm Elections.”
Latest News Stories
Illinois Quick Hits: Diesel passes $6; unleaded price drops
U.S. Senate panel to examine fertilizer costs, food prices
Green Garden Solar Project Cleared to Implement Higher “Agrivoltaic” Standards
Frankfort Leaders Push Back Against Proposed State Mandates Threatening Local Zoning Control
Everyday Economics: Stable but weak under the surface
Committee: Facilities Department Reports $92,000 in Energy Savings, Completes Veterans Assistance Commission Buildout
Nebraska voters to elect party representatives
U.S. farmers struggling with high price of fuel, fertilizer as bankruptcies rise
Trump, Xi meeting to be packed with slew of hot topics
Green Garden Solar Farm Approved in Split Vote; Battery Storage Component Rejected
Bill to expel students over sexual assault progresses in Springfield
Viral goose egg case fuels debate over abortion